cover story "Umbruchim German law" by Heribert Prantl Süddeutsche Zeitung, 12th January 2011
My comment dazuzu this cover story.
It's strange, you should really think that overloading of the judiciary would have to logically lead to more staff costs this field set to a real relief to come. Principle after the demand is too high, an increase in the offer. It will be made by anyone to question obdiese massive demand is not from a massive injustice in derGesellschaft and in the workplace and the silent cry nachGerechtigkeit in this way train breaks down.
I have to be experienced at first hand and just now erlebeich performed again in my circle of job cuts as these strategies in denFirmen. My friend is massively overloaded workplace and attempted to leave through intelligent planning, this zuüberleben somehow. The company has conducted an investigation into how many Person for the job are necessary. There were already massive sick leave and burnout in the Department of presence. The result of this investigation the company was that you need 6 people less. derArbeitsrealität Given this is a slap in the face of every employee's normal! And it clearly shows that the decision already determined before the study and this study only as Alibibenötigt. Where is because our constitution? Where's the sentence that human dignity is inviolable?
The only way that the worker and a very expensive is it to go to court to obtain rights to which a company bound. Instead, it will now prepend a mediation! That is, processes are shorter but not longer, since mediation is upstream. Who bears the costs, as you can see, alright. Since most do not mean "Ackermann" who pays it out of petty cash, but if you do not have insurance, with thefirm, workers and precarious employment, which they must Kostenabstottern. And after the legal aid does not cover it, should it actually turn, already held a violation of human rights. For mantrennt mediation process and by not carrying out the costs and preventing it at all zumProzess and "human rights claim" comes from legal aid.
The fact thatthe Minister wants to pay until the mediation is not, perhaps to create any subsequent Act, that these costs will be in legal aid, clearly shows that the Minister relies on the forgetfulness and außerdemist the likelihood that you will no longer in office. And you damithat a law to the detriment of the poorer and middle classes created and has a law that serves justice for Bombardier.
Angelika
0 comments:
Post a Comment